Journalistic credibility aside, I thought this Seattle Times article was an interesting example of transparency and the impact of the blogosphere. Apparently, the whole affair has spun up a bit as well. What I find most remarkable is how commonplace it is for 'journalists' to leverage the blogosphere as a source of information.
On a broad scale, the implications of this are pretty staggering - here's an entire article that creates marketing impressions on thousands of potential store-level candidates (never mind our customer base) and is primarily founded in the exchange of ideas in the blogosphere. Interesting...
Comments